Curator & Collector

A Blog about the Art, Museums, and Numismatics of the Northwest Coast

Update to Reading Reid

Filed under: Bill Reid,Canadians in the Arts,Northwest Coast Aboriginal Art — July 25, 2010 @ 3:38 pm

Don Yeomans box used to carry the box that carried Bill Reid's ashes to his final resting place

My second edition Shadbolt [see the preceding post] arrived some days ago, and I read the last chapter and admired all the photographs in it. The photographs are much better, for the most part: they are brighter and sharper than in the first edition. As far as I can see, the text in the bulk of the book has not been updated, but I did not look closely. I did very much enjoy the new final chapter, with a multitude of photographs, including one of Reid’s final masterpiece, the Jade Canoe. A few of the most interesting photos I saw in the new final chapter showed the beautiful box that Don Yeomans carved (the one that sits in the Bill Reid Gallery on the mezzanine level) being used to transport the smaller box that carried Reid’s ashes to his final resting place. The Yeomans box functioned as a carrying box, while the smaller box was the urn. (The carrying box was carried by hand, and also by canoe.) I couldn’t help being reminded of the story, told by Reid, of the old man with his “box which contained a box which contained an infinite number of boxes each nestled in a box slightly larger than itself until finally there was a box so small all it could contain was all the light in the universe” (Reid’s The Raven Steals the Light, p. 19).

By the way, I very much regret the graininess of the above picture; I find that my camera does less well indoors with no flash.

Reading Reid

Filed under: Bill Reid,Canadian Art,Northwest Coast Aboriginal Art,Personal — July 20, 2010 @ 8:15 pm

In the last few months, I’ve used my lengthy commuting time to get a lot of reading done. Specifically, I’ve read several books about the aboriginal art of the northwest coast. They are, in the order I finished them:

-Solitary Raven: The Essential Writings of Bill Reid, edited by Robert Bringhurst

-The Raven Steals the Light, a retelling to Haida mythology by Bill Reid and Robert Bringhurst

-Bill Reid, an art-historical, quasi-biographical work by Doris Shadbolt (1st edition)

-Bill Reid and Beyond: Expanding on Modern Native Art, edited by Karen Duffek and Charlotte Townsend-Gault.

I had intended to do a proper review of each of these here, but unusual levels of busy-ness prevented me from reviewing at the rate I was reading, and I may end out re-reading each work in order to review them all properly. Alternatively, I may post the odd musing as I find time.

I can say a few things: Reid was a very talented writer, and his prose was as enjoyable for me to read as the essays of C.S. Lewis were when I was a boy, and for me that is high praise. (In fact, I still admire Lewis’s writings, though his starting point as a religious Christian is no longer something I share.) Second, Reid could not have had a better editor than Robert Bringhurst, himself a poet. Interestingly, I learned from the Shadbolt book that Bringhurst wrote several of the stories of The Raven Steals the Light, but the volume does not specify which ones, and neither did Shadbolt. I will have to bring out my source-critical skills, acquired in the study of the Hebrew Bible and its antecedents, to see if I can ascertain which pieces were by which writer!

The Shadbolt book, beautifully-illustrated, was enormously helpful. I picked up my copy, signed by both Reid and Shadbolt, from a used bookstore that sold the book over Ebay. At the same time, though, I found Shadbolt’s syntax and diction often clumsy, and the book could have been better than it was. As things remain, though, it is indispensable, if only for the wealth of Reid’s oral communications that have been transcribed there, and the handy timeline of artistic works.

The Bill Reid and Beyond book should be mandatory reading for anyone interested in the northwest coast aboriginal art “revival,” or “renaissance” that occurred in the latter half of the twentieth century. After reading this collection of academic essays, I have come to realize that the period was much more complex than Reid and Shadbolt made it out to be. Reid had taken the Haida experience of artistic production as normative for the entire northwest coast, and this was a large error in itself. Furthermore, the narrative that Reid participated in failed to take adequate account of the Haida art that did continue to be produced. Reid’s thesis, which predated him, was one of discontinuity and death in the First Nations art of this area. Reid set himself up as the best link with the past, the old art, ignoring the experience of many other First Nations artists. It was particularly interesting to read, if I may use the word, how Reid dethroned Mungo Martin as the link in the chain back to the past. Clearly, the picture is complex, and Reid, himself a complex man, grew and developed within this time, and left his well-made mark on our spirits and in our institutions and collections. If the words “revival” and “renaissance” have been discounted by the academics, surely we can all agree that Reid actively participated in a “flowering” of late twentieth century First Nations art along the northwest coast, and it was a marvelous flowering indeed. For my part, I find the presence of his artwork on Canada’s most frequently used banknote an appropriate climax of his humanistic, creative energy.

Philistines

Filed under: Art Heists,Canadian Art,Northwest Coast Aboriginal Art — June 27, 2010 @ 8:03 pm

Supposed Ming Dynasty stolen artwork image taken from the CBC

Supposed Ming Dynasty stolen artwork image taken from the CBC

I occasionally call myself a philistine when I mention that most modern art really doesn’t do much for me. I think a lot of five year olds can pull off what some contemporary artists do, and to me it doesn’t matter that the artists could potentially do much more. Nevertheless, I’m a little surprised at the number of modern day philistines who surround us. Most of the top-recommended comments on this CBC story, about a $150,000 artwork that was robbed at gunpoint from a Richmond, BC, gallery are all written by and recommended by people who haven’t a clue about art, economics, collecting, or even insurance. Some think that an artwork from the 14th century should be worth much more than $150,000, as though the artist, the number of artworks made and the number that have survived, the condition, and market demand had no bearing at all. Others can’t fathom how an artwork worth “200k” could be on display in a gallery in a mall. These folks have evidently never been to the better art galleries of any major city, including their own.*

Meanwhile, I saw today in one particularly fascinating art gallery holding northwest coast First Nations art the comment “it was as boring as hell.” Unfortunately, I believe it was one of my former students who may have written it. (The program these students were in finished shortly before this post was written.) Speaking of students, two juvenile would-be commenters, one from a school in Calgary, and another from a school in Kelowna, left a lot of foul language in badly misspelled and badly-punctuated comments on this blog’s entries on some of Bill Reid’s more notable sculptures. I did not publish the comments by these young Vandals.

Perhaps one of the worst examples, though was from a middle-aged person who, upon seeing Reid’s The Raven and the First Men, confided, without a trace of irony, “well isn’t that silly? In my village in North Africa, we were taught that God created Adam and Eve.” Good art’s not for everyone, and not all genres are for everyone, but some people simply need to open their minds and hearts. There’s much they’re missing out on.

*It could turn out, of course, that the claim was staged–but the price-tag alone shouldn’t make anyone think so.

The Face in the Raven’s Tale, and Other Faces

Bill Reid's Raven and the First Men 3

Rear-side view of Bill Reid’s “The Raven and the First Men”*

When I took a group of young people to UBC’s Museum of Anthropology some days ago, one of them asked me about the significance of the face at the bottom of the giant yellow cedar version of Reid’s The Raven and the First Men. I myself have wondered this, and until recently was unable to answer properly.

In “The Classical Artist on the Northwest Coast,” an essay in Solitary Raven: The Essential Writings of Bill Reid (an eminently readable book, and the subject of another post), Reid says:

“the face on the tail of the Raven is an elaboration of the joint mark in which the ovoid has pretty well disappeared altogether. The concentric ovoids that you generally find in such a thing have been taken over by the face, which originally would have decorated only the central ovoid. It has expanded to take over the whole thing. So although it is a face, it doesn’t represent anything in itself. It is just an elaborated joint mark” (p. 140).

The joint mark is the negative space white circle that appears, for example, in my post on negative space in the aboriginal art of the northwest coast. The concentric circles, and also negative space crescents, can be seen in Reid’s traditional form-line Haida Dogfish:

Haida Dogfish by Bill Reid

Image of Bill Reid’s “Haida Dogfish” taken from
The Canadian Museum of Civilization

The ovoids to which Reid refers, including the central body ovoid which contains the face are “compressed into circles” as Hillary Stewart remarks in her comments about this artwork in her book Looking at the Indian Art of the Northwest Coast.

Reid would go a step further from his dogfish portrayal in his Haida Beaver Tsing:

Haida Beaver by Bill Reid

Image of Bill Reid’s “Haida Beaver Tsing” taken from
Spirits of the West Coast Art Gallery

Perhaps the most extreme example of this elaboration of joint marks into faces occurs in Reid’s stunning, very busy (and almost disorienting) Haida Bear**

Haida Bear by Bill Reid

Image of Reid’s “Haida Bear” taken from
the Lattimer Gallery


*For those who have not had an introduction to the First Nations art of the northwest coast, please see the table of contents to my little blog post series on this subject.

**There seems to be some confusion over the precise name of this artwork. I will endeavour to find out the exact name within the next week or so.

Acquisitions, Accessions, and a Terry Fox Loonie

Filed under: Donations & Fundraising,Museums & Galleries,Numismatics — June 17, 2010 @ 9:43 pm

First Day Terry Fox coin (234x300)

Official First Day Terry Fox Coin

I recently learned that when a museum accessions a piece, it gives it a number, for example, 2003.4.3.2. The 2003 would refer to the year that a piece was acquired by the museum, the 4 would indicate that this was the fourth accession of that year, while the next number would note that this is the third object within this accession. The 2 would refer to the number of constituent parts the item has. I am pleased to see that at least one collections manager thinks as I first thought: that a simple number, beginning with 1 and working upwards, would be sufficient.

Some within the museum industry see the term “acquisition” as denoting only the transfer of legal title to an object to the museum. The “accession” of the object then follows when it is catalogued. Most institutions will occasionally accept items, without necessarily entering them into their actual collections records. Thus, these objects can remain uncatalogued and otherwise undocumented. This can be done so as not to upset donors when their pieces are not really worthy of display.

I recently donated the small, inexpensive (less than $30) but representative item above to a local museum (which is not connected with the person mentioned above). The museum in question is the BC Sports Hall of Fame, and the Official First Day Terry Fox coin is for their Terry Fox exhibit.* (Incidentally, Terry Fox, who was recently ranked the Greatest Canadian by a citizen’s poll, is the first and so far only identifiable Canadian to be depicted on a Canadian coin). Unfortunately, the museum is undergoing renovations and will not re-open until next year. I signed a form stating that I owned the piece, was given a record of my donation, and was told that my piece would be on display when the institution reopened its doors next year. Those wanting to know more can visit this post from over a year ago for background.


I am not a sports-oriented person at all, but I liked the exhibits on Rick Hansen and Terry Fox in this museum when I visited it last year. These two heroes are an inspiration to all, and it was on that basis that I made my little donation.

The Case of the McMichael Collection

Filed under: Canadian Art,Controversies,Literature on Museums,Museums & Galleries — June 5, 2010 @ 9:31 pm

Tom Thomson Pine Island image taken from the McMichael Collection's website

Tom Thomson Pine Island image taken from the McMichael Collection

I just finished a most fascinating account of the controversy over the McMichael Collection (“Case Notes: One Premier’s Obsession? The McMichael Legislation in Ontario,” by Kenneth R. Cavalier in International Journal of Cultural Property 11:1 (2002) pp. 65–79). The McMichael Collection began as a gift to the Province of Ontario from Robert and Signe McMichael in 1965. The McMichael Collection was primarily a collection of Group of Seven artists’ works. Over time, the curators of the collection acquired a good many contemporary art pieces, and strayed outside the collecting mores of the McMichaels. As time went on, the issue of whether the Collection should be considered as public art gallery or art museum became a contentious issue that split the arts community of Ontario, in addition to making it to the Ontario Court of Appeals and eventually the provincial legislature. The McMichaels fought in court, unsuccessfully, to force the curators of the collection they had donated to adhere to their wishes; when they lost, they prevailed upon the Mike Harris government to bring in legislation that put both of them permanently on the five-person Board. Furthermore, the legislation stipulated that the collection’s scope should primarily focus on “the cultural heritage of Canada,” being “comprised of art works and objects and related documentary material created by or about (a) Tom Thomson, Emily Carr, David Milne, A. Y. Jackson, Lawren Harris, A. J. Casson, Frederick Varley, Arthur Lismer, J. H. MacDonald and Franklin Carmichael”* in addition to others the art advisory committee (which was to include both McMichaels) might choose to collect. In an unusual twist, the Minister of Citizenship, Culture, and Recreation was given the temporary authority to accept or reject all by-laws made by the Board.

The point of the article applies to all institutions that allow donations. What are the policies of the institution in regards to acquisitions, loans, and deaccessions? What are the rights of the donors? I personally believe that institutions need to adhere to their contracts with their donors, and for me that means not only the letter of the contract, but the spirit of the donation. Institutions aren’t forced to accept donations, so they need to exercise good judgment about which objects to accept, and the conditions the donors would wish to attach. Similarly, donors need sound legal advice when making a donation.

I am indeed glad that the McMichaels, now both deceased, won their battle, and the next time I am in Toronto, I will make the trip out to Kleinburg to see this large and important collection of historic Canadian art.


*Section 8 of the McMichael Canadian Art Collection Amendment Act of 2000.

Collections Access

Filed under: Literature on Museums — June 5, 2010 @ 6:35 pm

I just finished reading Jeanette A. Richoux, Jill Serota-Braden and Nancy Demyttanaere’s article “A Policy for Collections Access” (Museum News Vol. 59 No 7 (July/August 1981), pp. 43-47). It was interesting, but at the stage of my career, when I neither need access to stored objects nor am in a position to make decisions about who does, I don’t have any need of it. It certainly seems useful enough to mentally file away for future reference, though.

Creating a Collections Management Policy Document

Filed under: Literature on Museums — June 5, 2010 @ 6:22 pm

In Things Great and Small — Collections Management Policies, chapter 2 “Compiling Collections Management Policies,” John E. Simmons gives an overview of how museums and galleries can establish collections management policies. For obvious reasons, Timmons cautions against merely copying another institution’s policies; Timmons then recommends that the language to be used in the policy manual adhere to standard professional usage. That is to say, artefacts, objects, and specimens are the terms that are likely to be used by, respectively, anthropological museums, art and history institutions, and scientific institutions. Timmons then lays out an eight-step procedure that begins with choosing the writing team (a team, not an individual), proceeds through review, feedback, governance endorsement, and then finishes with periodic revision. Perhaps the most valuable aspect of the article, though, is the two page chart showing a rather exhaustive list of topics the policy document could contain. Topics to be included include everything from the identifying of the scope of the collection, to collections care and risk management.

An Arctic Lawren Harris Sells at Auction

Filed under: Auctions,Canadian Art — May 27, 2010 @ 8:28 pm

Lawren Harris' Bylot Island I (500x355) image taken with permission from Heffel.com

Image of Lawren Harris’s “Bylot Island I” taken with permission from Heffel.com

“Bylot I,” an Arctic themed painting by my favourite Group of Seven artist Lawren Harris just sold for $2.8 million at Heffel’s recent May 2010 auction in Vancouver. I enjoyed watching the auction, and hope to keep up with future ones.

Heffel’s Fine Canadian Art Auction of May 26, 2010

Filed under: Auctions,Canadian Art — May 26, 2010 @ 8:23 pm

Heffel Auction May 26 2010 Emily Carr Emily and Lizzie

Screenshot of live auction taken from Heffel.com

I’ve just discovered that Heffel Auctions has a live link to their current auction at Heffel.com. The artwork shown above is lot 171, Emily Carr’s Emily and Lizzie, which sold for $400,000 plus a buyer’s premium. The Bill Reid sculpture I mentioned a few days ago sold for $702,000, including the buyer’s premium, setting a new record for a sculpture by a Canadian artist.